Full Text:
영남의대학술지 Vol.24_No.2 Suppl. P.S544-548, Dec. 2007
Original Article
흉부압박대 인공호흡 비율의 변화에 따른 소생술 방법의 정확도 비교: 마네킨을 이용한 연구
Comparison of the Accuracy of the CPR Methods According to Change of the Ratio between Compression and Ventilation: Using a Training Mannikin
이성훈, 이삼범, 도병수
영남대학교 의과대학 응급의학교실
책임저자：이삼범, 대구광역시 남구 대명 5동 317-1, 영남대학교 의과대학 응급의학교실
Tel: (053) 620-3193, Fax: (053) 628-7106
E-mail: sblee@med.yu.ac.kr
December 30, 2007
Abstract
Background：Newly revised cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) guideline in 2005 recommends 30 chest compressions and 2 rescue breaths during CPR for all rescuers to use for all adult victims. We would compare the accuracy of the CPR methods by revised CPR guideline in 2005 and previous guideline in 2000. Materials and Methods：Fifty medical students during the introduction to clinical medicine (ICM) were investigated after 30 minutes lecture and brief education of CPR methods. Each students performed twice both CPR methods, the one by guideline 2005 (method A), 4 cycles of 30 compressions every 2 breaths, and the other by guideline 2000 (method B), 10 cycles of 15 compressions every 2 breaths. Resci® Anne mannekin and Laerdal® skillmeter were used and paper reports were printed after each tests. After then, we compared the technical accuracy of the results between method A (30:2) and method B (15:2). Results：Total fifty students (37 males, 13 females) were tested, their mean age was 25.1, mean body weight was 63.5 kg. The technical accuracy on chest compression was not different between two methods and also the technical accuracy on ventilation was not different between two methods except total ventilation number (p>0.05). Conclusion：We could not find significant differences of technical accuracy between both CPR methods. So we don’t think new guideline 2005 is superior to previous guideline 2000 by technical efforts although it’s hemodynamic responses and other clinical benefits is excluded in this study.
Key Words: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), Ratio, Accuracy
References
	1. Lee SB. New guidelines for resuscitation (CPR). J Kor Neurol Ass 2006 Apr:24(suppl.1);153-6.
	2. Hostler D, Guimond G, Callaway CW. A comparison of CPR delivery with various compression-to-ventilation ratios during two- rescuer CPR. Resuscitation 2005;65:325-8.
	3. Guidelines 2000 for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Part 3. Adult basic life support. The American Heart Association in collaboration with the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. Circulation 2000;102(8 Suppl.):I22-I59.
	4. 2005 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2005 Dec;112 (24 Suppl.).
	5. International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. Part 4. Advanced life support. Resuscitation 2005;67:213-47.
	6. Highlights of the 2005 AHA Guidelines for CPR and ECC. Currents in Emergency Cardiovascular Care 2005-2006 Winter;16(4).
	7. The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR). 2005 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations. Resuscitation 2005;67(1).
	8. European Resuscitation Council (ERC) Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005. Resuscitation 2005;67 (S1).
	9. Deschilder K, Vos RD, Stockman W. The effect on quality of chest compressions and exhaustion of a compression-ventilation ratio of 30:2 versus 15:2 during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. A randomised trial. Resuscitation 2007;74:113-8.
	10. Hostler D, Rittenberger JC, Roth R, Callaway CW. Increased chest compression to ventilation ratio improves delivery of CPR. Resuscitation 2007;74:446-52.
	11. Srikantan SK, Berg RA, Cox T, Tice L, Nadkarni VM. Effect of one-rescuer compression/ ventilation ratios on cardiopulmonary resuscitation in infant, pediatric, and adult manikins. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2005;6:293-7.
	12. Odegaard S, Saether E, Steen PA, Wik L. Quality of lay person CPR performance with compression: ventilation ratios 15:2, 30:2 or continuous chest compressions without ventila- tions on manikins. Resuscitation 2006;71:335-40.